The effectiveness of interventions that support women, girls, and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity: a rapid overview of reviews

Background and Context

This review focuses on physical activity levels in adults aged 18-64, highlighting that women, girls, and people who menstruate are less likely to meet recommended activity levels due to barriers like gender bias, low self-confidence, and lack of support. Understanding these barriers is crucial for improving public health and fostering inclusive participation in physical activities.

Aims

The review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to encourage physical activity among women, girls, and menstruating individuals. They sought to identify whether these interventions considered the impact of the menstrual cycle on physical activity participation.

Strategy

The research involved a rapid overview of fifteen systematic reviews published between 2008 and 2024. The reviews included studies focusing on various age groups, from young girls to adult women, and different settings like schools and communities. The researchers employed a qualitative analysis approach to synthesize the data.

Outcomes

The key findings revealed a diverse range of interventions, including educational and environmental strategies. However, none specifically addressed managing physical activity during the menstrual cycle. The effectiveness of these interventions varied, leading to inconclusive results. Notably, there was a lack of focus on ethnic minorities and non-binary individuals who menstruate.

Impact

This research underscores the need for targeted interventions that consider the menstrual cycle and address specific barriers faced by different demographic groups. It calls for more rigorous, standardized research methods to produce reliable data. By informing policies and guidelines, this work aims to reduce societal taboos around menstruation and promote inclusive physical activity practices, ultimately benefiting public health and well-being.

To read the full report, click here.

This Rapid Overview of Reviews follows on from a Rapid Evidence Summary conducted in July 2024.

Lay Summary Author: Anthony Cope, Public Partnership Group Member